View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Nov 21, 2017 3:54 pm



← Back to the Calcudoku puzzle page




Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
 good analytical solution for a specific 4x4 difficult? 
Author Message
User avatar

Posted on: Tue Jul 01, 2014 5:21 pm




Posts: 2209
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 11:58 pm
 good analytical solution for a specific 4x4 difficult?
in particular, one of the harder ones of June: http://www.calcudoku.org/en/2014-06-09/4/3
(more than a week old, so that link won't give you the puzzle if you're not a subscriber)

Here it is:

Image

I was thinking along these lines:
- d1d2 can either be 1,2 => not possible, because then (20 - 11 - 3) = 6 is impossible,
or 2,3 => then c1 = 4, or 3,4, then c1 = 2
- either way, there must be a 1 in d3 or d4
- if c1 = 4, then a1b1b2 = 1,2,1, which is impossible because of the 7+ cage
- so c1 = 2
- so d3d4 = 1/2, and d1d2 = 3/4
- a2 + a3 = 7, so a2a3 = 3/4
- so a1=1, a4=2
- if a3=3, then c2 = 1, if a3=4, then c2 = 2, which is impossible, so c2 = 1
- so b1b2 = 3,2
- etc.

Any cleaner paths possible? [huh]


Profile
User avatar

Posted on: Tue Jul 01, 2014 8:00 pm




Posts: 219
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:15 pm
Post Re: good analytical solution for a specific 4x4 difficult?
The first thing I did was note that 40 - 8 - 7 - 11 = 14. From that
- both a2a3 and d1d2 have to be 3,4.
- d3d4 is 1,2 ==> c2c3c4 = 8 thus 1,3,4 ==> c1 = 2
- a1 = 1, a4=2
- a2=3,4 and c2=1,3,4 and d2=3,4 ==> b2 = 2 and b1 = 3
- a4=2 ==> d4 = 1, d3 = 2
- b4 has to be 4
- etc.


Profile
User avatar

Posted on: Tue Jul 01, 2014 8:05 pm




Posts: 2209
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 11:58 pm
Post Re: good analytical solution for a specific 4x4 difficult?
jaek wrote:
The first thing I did was note that 40 - 8 - 7 - 11 = 14. From that
- both a2a3 and d1d2 have to be 3,4.


Ah... of course. I'm just using the "row/column adds up to 10" a few times,
but never considered "40 - '+ cages'" [blink]


Profile

Posted on: Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:00 pm




Posts: 693
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 6:51 pm
Post Re: good analytical solution for a specific 4x4 difficult?
pnm wrote:
jaek wrote:
The first thing I did was note that 40 - 8 - 7 - 11 = 14. From that
- both a2a3 and d1d2 have to be 3,4.


Ah... of course. I'm just using the "row/column adds up to 10" a few times,
but never considered "40 - '+ cages'" [blink]


Same line as jaek, you can only have a total of 14 for both cages "1-" with the "maximums" [3,4] in both cages simultaneously, btw it's very frequent to add all cages in this type of 4x4's. Then, since 8 + 7 + 7 = 22, i.e., the excess over the sum of the two leftmost columns gives c1 = 2. Now, since a2 + c2 = 5 (two upmost rows: 20 - 8 - 7) and a2 = 2, c2 = 3 is not valid because a 2 is not inside cage "1-" in a2-a3 ... it must be a2 = 4, c2 = 1 and the rest of the puzzle is immediate.


Profile

Posted on: Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:39 am




Posts: 497
Location: Ladysmith, BC, Canada
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:37 am
Post Re: good analytical solution for a specific 4x4 difficult?
Thank you jaek (as well as clm) as I used your method on today's puzzle and solved it quite quickly......in the past, these have been very bothersome for me and usually take in excess of 5 minutes to solve if I don't get a lucky guess with which to begin.

I was able to solve the yesterday's 6x6 using the same type of logic you presented for the 4x4 and once again a puzzle that would cause me to take a lot of time was solved quickly....thanx again.


Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 5 posts ] 

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
All forum contents © Patrick Min, and by the post authors.

Forum software phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.