Calcudoku puzzle forum
http://www.calcudoku.org/forum/

[Bug report] How did I finish a puzzle in 0.458 s?
http://www.calcudoku.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=924
Page 1 of 1

Author:  yeung1992  [ Sun Jun 11, 2017 6:32 am ]
Post subject:  [Bug report] How did I finish a puzzle in 0.458 s?

Image

Today I just played the time puzzle normally. But only when I finished a 4x4 puzzle (within 10 seconds), I realized that the clock was counting from negative. I don't know how this happened. I didn't cheat.

Author:  jpoos  [ Sun Jun 11, 2017 9:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [Bug report] How did I finish a puzzle in 0.458 s?

I guess I have to step up my game...

Author:  pnm  [ Sun Jun 11, 2017 10:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [Bug report] How did I finish a puzzle in 0.458 s?

So your time machine is finally working? [tongue]

Will check & update..

Author:  yeung1992  [ Sun Jun 11, 2017 11:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [Bug report] How did I finish a puzzle in 0.458 s?

pnm wrote:
So your time machine is finally working? [tongue]

Will check & update..


When I moved on to do the other 5 timed puzzles, the clock did counted normally.

Just don't understand why this occurred. There's no way I could be faster than jpoos. lol

Author:  pnm  [ Sun Jun 11, 2017 9:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [Bug report] How did I finish a puzzle in 0.458 s?

It looks like maybe your computer's clock corrected itself while you were solving the puzzle (?)

From the logs I see that the time sent from your PC was the 0.458 seconds

at the server a time was measured of 17 seconds (which includes network delay), so I got an automatic warning about the time anyway..

Unlikely to happen again I think.

Patrick

Author:  jpoos  [ Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [Bug report] How did I finish a puzzle in 0.458 s?

Oh, I just noticed his time is still in the best time rankings, even though it's not in yesterdays timed rankings... [confused]

Author:  pnm  [ Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [Bug report] How did I finish a puzzle in 0.458 s?

jpoos wrote:
Oh, I just noticed his time is still in the best time rankings, even though it's not in yesterdays timed rankings... [confused]

Thanks for pointing that out, fixed now.

People's best times (and averages) are kept in an extra table (to make it more efficient to produce the rankings lists).

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/