Calcudoku puzzle forumhttp://www.calcudoku.org/forum/ No-op twinshttp://www.calcudoku.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=742 Page 1 of 1

 Author: sjs34  [ Sat Oct 10, 2015 2:24 pm ] Post subject: No-op twins I have never understood why it is necessary to enter operations on no-op solutions since the number solutions are unique and sufficient and the operation solutions are not unique. It is even more tedious to have to enter operations on both twins of a solution. I like no-op twins, though.

 Author: pnm  [ Sat Oct 10, 2015 2:37 pm ] Post subject: Re: No-op twins sjs34 wrote:I have never understood why it is necessary to enter operations on no-op solutions since the number solutions are unique and sufficient and the operation solutions are not unique. It is even more tedious to have to enter operations on both twins of a solution. I like no-op twins, though.This has been a discussion on the forum a while back, but I can't seem to find the thread :-|

 Author: bram  [ Sat Oct 10, 2015 3:38 pm ] Post subject: Re: No-op twins pnm wrote:This has been a discussion on the forum a while back, but I can't seem to find the thread :-|That's because it's not a separate thread but part of the more general thread "testing no-op puzzles", which you started just after introducing no-ops to calcudoku.org. For anyone who wants to read just the specific discussion, I think it's most convenient to start with *ahem* my post (which quotes an earlier post by sjs34) and read on from there

 Author: marblevolcano  [ Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:01 pm ] Post subject: Re: No-op twins In the 121 Advanced Puzzles Vol. II, there are two no-op twins from zero in the "Variations" Chapter. (I already solved them, but they were awesome )PS: I actually just got a No-op bonus puzzle, and I was kind of annoyed that I had to fill in the operators to finish the puzzle, because it was kind of unnecessary. I mean, it doesn't matter when submitting no-op book puzzles, so why have it online?

 Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ] Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Grouphttp://www.phpbb.com/