Author 
Message 
jomapil
Posted on: Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:57 am
Posts: 248 Location: Lisbon, Portugal Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:40 pm

Bitwise operator
Hi everyone.
I made some combinations and n looks like n+ . But with good knowledge of this mathematics, at first sight, it's not so evident.
Please tell me if there is a rule to see easily if n is even or odd.
In any case the number of possibilities with n is greater or lesser than n+? Or there isn't an absolute rule about this?
Thank you for your explanation.
P.S. 3+ = 1+2 ( one hypothesis ) but 3 = 1101 and 1110 and 1001 ( three hypothesis )
Is it always in this way?
_________________Visit http://www.calcudoku.org the most interesting and addictive site of puzzles.




honkhonk
Posted on: Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:34 am
Posts: 36 Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 8:23 am

Re: Bitwise operator
*Spoiler* <Don't read this if you want to figure the bitwise operator by yourself> *Spoiler*
I don't think there is an absolute rule. In case of a cage of 2 the combinations possible are limited though
For example: 5+=3+2, 4+1 but 5= 41, 54, 51 6+=4+2, 5+1 but 6= 46, 42, 26
Only 7 has a lot of combinations possible among which are 7x with x any number but 8
Does this help?
Last edited by honkhonk on Tue Sep 20, 2011 7:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.




jomapil
Posted on: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:55 am
Posts: 248 Location: Lisbon, Portugal Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:40 pm

Re: Bitwise operator
Sadly it seems there is no absolute rule. But if n is even the cage is always even, but if n! is odd the cage can be odd or even.
Please anyone confirms if this is true.
I didn't understand what you want to say with 7 . Thanks, honkhonk.
_________________Visit http://www.calcudoku.org the most interesting and addictive site of puzzles.




honkhonk
Posted on: Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:23 pm
Posts: 36 Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 8:23 am

Re: Bitwise operator
What I meant is:
In a 2cage situation 7 can be
71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 but also 61, 63, 65, 53, 52, 43
Just not the number 8.
I think you're looking for a rule you don't really need to solve the bitwise operator puzzles
If you say n is even then the 2cage is even, you are right since 6 is 42, 64 and 62; 10 is 82, 12 is 84 and 14 is 86 If you say n is odd then the 2cage is odd or even you say the 2cage can be anything which is right 1, 2, 4, 8 don't exist so you don't need them. This leaves 3, 5 an 6 with each 3 possibilities and 7 with 10 possibillities. The n 2cages with n>7 contain an 8 and n8.
So try first to locate 2cages with n>7, they are easy to solve. Next try regular cages with no  operator or try cages with limited possibilities like 5, 3 and 6. You can also solve 7 cages provided you know there is no 7 in the solution or you know more numbers in the column/row (then the possibillities are limited).
In general: The general rule with binary numbers is that any decimal number that is odd, in binary representation has a last bit set to 1 (1=001, 5=101 etc) (Decimal numbers that are even have a last bit set to 0) When you apply the bitwise OR operator to two operands of which at least one is odd the value of this last bit will always be 1. Because if you have the numbers **1 and *** on which you use the bitwise OR operation the last bit '1 or *' = 1 no matter what the value of *.
Hence if you want the bitwise OR to have an even result (6, 8 etc) BOTH operands must be even (last bit set to 0). Thus for any cage n with n even both numbers must be even, for n odd at least one number must be odd.
Truth table of the OR operand:
00 = 0 10= 1 01 = 1 11 = 1
When this is the last bit it transalates to: eveneven = even oddeven = odd evenodd = odd oddodd = odd




jomapil
Posted on: Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:14 pm
Posts: 248 Location: Lisbon, Portugal Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:40 pm

Re: Bitwise operator
OK honkhonk.
You avoided I did those calculus. So the great difficulty is only the 7 .
I only didn't understand why you say 7 has 10 possibilities and those possibilities are 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 but also 61, 63, 65, 53, 52, 43
a total of 12.
Thank you very much.
_________________Visit http://www.calcudoku.org the most interesting and addictive site of puzzles.




honkhonk
Posted on: Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:23 pm
Posts: 36 Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 8:23 am

Re: Bitwise operator
My mistake, should be 12. Clm: you're also right. I corrected it.... I'm not that good with numbers greetz, HonkHonk
Last edited by honkhonk on Tue Sep 20, 2011 7:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.




clm
Posted on: Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:22 pm
Posts: 609 Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 4:51 pm

Re: Bitwise operator
honkhonk wrote: I don't think there is an absolute rule. In case of a cage of 2 the combinations possible are limited though
For example: 5+=3+2, 4+1 but 5= 41, 24, 12 6+=4+2, 5+1 but 6= 46, 42, 26
Only 7 has a lot of combinations possible among which are 7x with x any number but 8
Does this help?
honkhonk, I think there is a little mistake in 5 = 41, 24, 12; it must be 5 = 41, 45, 15, a 2 is not valid inside a cage 5 since it activates bit number 2. Your explanation about the 12 combinations for 7 is very clear, as well as the analysis with the parity. jomapil, you may observe that 53 and 75 (valid for 7 produce an even cage). The parity itself, as the addition itself, is not very useful when we have the operation bitwise OR, only perhaps when finalizing the puzzle. If we have a three cells cage (Lshape), the number of combinations increase dramatically (see my post "Searching for the operands" where I detailed the 56 possibilities for an Lshape 3cells cage in the case of 7). It is better, in my opinion, just converting the possible operands to binary, apply the OR to the binary words and check the result, or inversely, eliminating numbers that "can not be present" (as the 8 in cages n where n < 8, or the 7 in cages n where n < 7, ...). For instance, 15 in a 3cell Lshaped cage may have 8 and the 12 combinations shown by honkhonk, but also 887, 778... . With practice it will become easy, and useful for all situations, think in a 3cells cage "in line" for instance (not very frequent in the calcudokus on tuesdays). My recommendation is playing with all this simply filling the cages in the puzzle and observing the response of the "continuous error checking" telling you in red the forbidden combinations.




jomapil
Posted on: Tue Sep 20, 2011 7:51 pm
Posts: 248 Location: Lisbon, Portugal Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:40 pm

Re: Bitwise operator
clm, you are right. 2 can't be inside a cage 5. We must change 2 for 5.
But 53 and 75 don't produce an even cage. You were right if it was XOR. But with OR it's enough one of the operators be odd and the result is an odd cage.
_________________Visit http://www.calcudoku.org the most interesting and addictive site of puzzles.




clm
Posted on: Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:27 pm
Posts: 609 Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 4:51 pm

Re: Bitwise operator
jomapil wrote: clm, you are right. 2 can't be inside a cage 5. We must change 2 for 5.
But 53 and 75 don't produce an even cage. You were right if it was XOR. But with OR it's enough one of the operators be odd and the result is an odd cage. I usually refer to an "even" cage when the sum of the numbers inside is even, so 5 + 3 = 8 and 7 + 5 = 12, would produce an "even" cage, also 71 and 73 (among the 12 combinations for the 7 in two cells referred by honkhonk) that also produce a 7 (in case of the bitwise OR) are cages "even". All this talking about the "parity" of the cage, in order to use it for the "parity" rule. That is the "paradox"; another case, i.e., with 5, the combination 15 produces an "even" cage, while 14 and 45 (both valid) are "odd" cages. Obviously in a cage n where n is even, the cage itself is even since all numbers inside must be even (the last bit is a zero because if any of the numbers were odd its last bit would be 1 and would set to 1 the last bit of the result of "ORing" all the numbers), and the sum even (finished in zero) as well explained by honkhonk. Consequently, the uncertainty with the parity of the cage only appears when, in a cage n, n is odd because now the "cage" itself can be odd or even; more examples: for a 15 in a 3cells Lshaped cage, 887 (total of 23, odd) or 877 (total of 22, even) are valid combinations; in the case of a cage 13, 815 (total of 14, even) and 845 (total of 17, odd) are also valid combinations (here, thus, we can see that the arithmetical value of the sum has nothing to do with the result of the bitwise OR operation, a total of 23, for instance, for a cage 15). The XOR, of course, is a different logic operation for the binary words, but for the moment we do not have it.




jomapil
Posted on: Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:14 am
Posts: 248 Location: Lisbon, Portugal Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:40 pm

Re: Bitwise operator
Hi, clm. You are right, of course. At first I understood your statement of a different way. In one of my replies to this thread I say: " But if n is even the cage is always even, but if n! is odd the cage can be odd or even."
exactly what you said.
Another point refers to the n cages of 3cells: In my first solved problem with bitwise OR ( 20Sep20118x8 difficult ) I didn't need what I'm going to tell you because I solved these 3cages in another way. But, on the whole, I eventually need to calculate great number of results ( 7 has, theoretically, 7^3 hypothesis, if I'm not wrong! ). Anyway we must calculate them? Or is there any secrets I don't know?
Best regards.
P.S.  As you see I'm not a great expert of English language, but I hope you understand me in the essencial.
_________________Visit http://www.calcudoku.org the most interesting and addictive site of puzzles.






You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum

