Author |
Message |
pnm
Posted on: Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:03 pm
Posts: 3305 Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 11:58 pm
|
woohoo
Finally beat "danvijan" on the 5x5 timed 65%/100 average time by a whopping 0.001 seconds! but for how long?
|
|
|
|
jaek
Posted on: Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:27 pm
Posts: 300 Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:15 pm
|
Re: woohoo
pnm wrote: Finally beat "danvijan" on the 5x5 timed 65%/100 average time by a whopping 0.001 seconds! but for how long? I do wonder if you haven't inspired danvijan to set a new personal goal for the 5x5 timed puzzles.
|
|
|
|
sheldolina
Posted on: Fri Jun 15, 2012 9:16 pm
Posts: 73 Location: Delft, The Netherlands Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 7:15 am
|
Re: woohoo
pnm wrote: Finally beat "danvijan" on the 5x5 timed 65%/100 average time by a whopping 0.001 seconds! Now, what about setting a real goal this time, like beating me? That would be, like, actually impressive.
|
|
|
|
pnm
Posted on: Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:03 pm
Posts: 3305 Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 11:58 pm
|
Re: woohoo
sheldolina wrote: Now, what about setting a real goal this time, like beating me? That would be, like, actually impressive. Yeah yeah. I'd have to go into hard training for that... (or just speed up the timer when you're playing )
|
|
|
|
danvijan
Posted on: Sat Jun 16, 2012 12:17 pm
Posts: 19 Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 10:46 am
|
Re: woohoo
pnm wrote: I'd have to go into hard training for that...
I don't think hard training is enough. You have to do a "Benjamin Button" routine, and actually get younger as time goes by. As for our little battle for the 5th, I won't go down without a fight
|
|
|
|
pnm
Posted on: Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:08 pm
Posts: 3305 Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 11:58 pm
|
Re: woohoo
danvijan wrote: As for our little battle for the 5th, I won't go down without a fight One planned change, by the way: times expire after one year (so people who haven't played in a long time slowly go down the rankings) Patrick
|
|
|
|
picklepep
Posted on: Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:52 pm
Posts: 98 Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 12:48 am
|
Re: woohoo
pnm wrote: danvijan wrote: As for our little battle for the 5th, I won't go down without a fight One planned change, by the way: times expire after one year (so people who haven't played in a long time slowly go down the rankings) Patrick Even all time rankings??? That doesn't make that much sense. Didn't Hank Aaron hold the most homeruns in a season for about 50 years?
|
|
|
|
pnm
Posted on: Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:59 pm
Posts: 3305 Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 11:58 pm
|
Re: woohoo
picklepep wrote: Even all time rankings??? That doesn't make that much sense. Didn't Hank Aaron hold the most homeruns in a season for about 50 years? Times set for the timed puzzles.
|
|
|
|
picklepep
Posted on: Sat Jun 16, 2012 3:06 pm
Posts: 98 Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 12:48 am
|
Re: woohoo
pnm wrote: picklepep wrote: Even all time rankings??? That doesn't make that much sense. Didn't Hank Aaron hold the most homeruns in a season for about 50 years? Times set for the timed puzzles. Yes I understand. My concern is for the all time best time. i.e. if I somehow never match my 37 sec 6x6 time it goes away in a year. It is still my personal best and I wouldn't like it to disappear. I think it is probably a good idea for the aggregates tho
|
|
|
|
pnm
Posted on: Sat Jun 16, 2012 3:24 pm
Posts: 3305 Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 11:58 pm
|
Re: woohoo
picklepep wrote: Yes I understand. My concern is for the all time best time. i.e. if I somehow never match my 37 sec 6x6 time it goes away in a year. It is still my personal best and I wouldn't like it to disappear. I think it is probably a good idea for the aggregates tho Good point. I can't assume everyone will continue to improve
|
|
|
|
|