Author |
Message |
sneaklyfox
Posted on: Sat Oct 29, 2011 5:28 pm
Posts: 428 Location: Canada Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 2:43 am
|
Re: Total daily scores/averages
I'm a little puzzled about Jackie's score which is 589 right now. Maybe I haven't been paying attention, but I don't think he got any timed puzzle points. Is this possible? 419 daily + max 12x7=84 book puzzles = 503. Add a few bonus puzzles only gets 553 or so. Or are there some book puzzles that yield more than 12 points?
|
|
|
|
jomapil
Posted on: Sat Oct 29, 2011 7:37 pm
Posts: 246 Location: Lisbon, Portugal Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 5:40 pm
|
Re: Total daily scores/averages
Maybe there is a bug, Sneaklyfox. Yesterday, with the bonus points I gained the usual puzzle, but about 20 points before I had managed a first bonus puzzle. That is, I had two bonus puzzles. Is there another bonus puzzle I don't know?
_________________Visit http://www.calcudoku.org the most interesting and addictive site of puzzles.
|
|
|
|
pnm
Posted on: Sat Oct 29, 2011 7:50 pm
Posts: 3301 Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 11:58 pm
|
Re: Total daily scores/averages
jomapil wrote: Maybe there is a bug, Sneaklyfox. Yesterday, with the bonus points I gained the usual puzzle, but about 20 points before I had managed a first bonus puzzle. That is, I had two bonus puzzles. Is there another bonus puzzle I don't know? No, I think it's a bug with the code that checks whether you should get a new bonus puzzle, looking into it... Patrick
|
|
|
|
pnm
Posted on: Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:07 pm
Posts: 3301 Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 11:58 pm
|
Re: Total daily scores/averages
It was a bug, and quite an annoying one: if you hit the bonus target exactly, the bonus target did not get updated (!) So the trick was: hit the bonus target exactly (may require some planning wrt. available points), solve the bonus puzzle, then solve another bonus puzzle..
I wish the people taking advantage of this had notified me, but there you go..
It's been fixed now.
Patrick
|
|
|
|
sneaklyfox
Posted on: Mon Jan 23, 2012 6:18 am
Posts: 428 Location: Canada Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 2:43 am
|
Re: Total daily scores/averages
Didn't want to start a new topic (although I guess I could start one called, "Report a Bug")... figured this was relevant enough...
What in the world is this?... Daily average over the last 30 days... Rank 1 - peter66 - 196 ?!?!?
Oh yeah, and it says he's been on for 9 days and got 1952 points. Must be a bug somewhere because that's kind of impossible. On the 7-day ranking, he doesn't have that many points...
|
|
|
|
beaker
Posted on: Mon Jan 23, 2012 10:45 am
Posts: 931 Location: Ladysmith, BC, Canada Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:37 am
|
Re: Total daily scores/averages
I thought that was a little much too!!!
|
|
|
|
pnm
Posted on: Mon Jan 23, 2012 10:54 am
Posts: 3301 Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 11:58 pm
|
Re: Total daily scores/averages
sneaklyfox wrote: Didn't want to start a new topic (although I guess I could start one called, "Report a Bug")... figured this was relevant enough...
What in the world is this?... Daily average over the last 30 days... Rank 1 - peter66 - 196 ?!?!?
Oh yeah, and it says he's been on for 9 days and got 1952 points. Must be a bug somewhere because that's kind of impossible. On the 7-day ranking, he doesn't have that many points... Good point, thanks: I combined two accounts for someone (ptr and peter66), and forgot to update the time he signed up..
|
|
|
|
jomapil
Posted on: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:17 pm
Posts: 246 Location: Lisbon, Portugal Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 5:40 pm
|
Re: Total daily scores/averages
Sneaklyfox: 7x15=95 is the same that ( some weeks ago ) Canada is in Europe.
_________________Visit http://www.calcudoku.org the most interesting and addictive site of puzzles.
|
|
|
|
beaker
Posted on: Wed Nov 21, 2012 2:08 am
Posts: 931 Location: Ladysmith, BC, Canada Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:37 am
|
Re: Total daily scores/averages
jomapil wrote: Sneaklyfox: 7x15=95 is the same that ( some weeks ago ) Canada is in Europe. September/2011 is "some weeks ago"???(time in Europe is a bit different than here I would guess)......besides she already explained the "mistake".
|
|
|
|
|