User avatar
subscriber
another (easy) tectonic
subscriber
Re: another (easy) tectonic
That was a fun one (if I did it correctly [smile] )

-Ville
User avatar
subscriber
Re: another (easy) tectonic
angryclown wrote:That was a fun one (if I did it correctly [smile] )

-Ville
ok, here's the solution [drool]

edit: this solution is of course incorrect, real solution posted a bit below...

Image
subscriber
Re: another (easy) tectonic
Thanks! But I have to ask... is the fifth number on the first row really a 4? I had a two in that cell.. Did I misunderstant the rules or something?

-Ville
User avatar
subscriber
Re: another (easy) tectonic
angryclown wrote:Thanks! But I have to ask... is the fifth number on the first row really a 4? I had a two in that cell.. Did I misunderstant the rules or something?

-Ville
Interesting how one can be blind to something like this..

no way there can be two 4's next to each other of course, will investigate...

It seems to have been something with the rendering of the solution (not the solver itself),
this is the correct solution:

Image
subscriber
Re: another (easy) tectonic
I know what you mean.. It's somewhat like the "phenomenon" where the the human eye/brain doesn't recognize if there are two "the" words next to each other in a sentence.

And I've had this happen in a puzzle where I just don't see that a row or a column has the same number twice etc...

But thanks for the correction, I thought my mind had gone :-)

-Ville
Post Reply