Calcudoku puzzle forum https://www.calcudoku.org/forum/ |
|
woohoo https://www.calcudoku.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=238 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | pnm [ Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | woohoo |
Finally beat "danvijan" on the 5x5 timed 65%/100 average time by a whopping 0.001 seconds! but for how long? |
Author: | jaek [ Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: woohoo |
pnm wrote: Finally beat "danvijan" on the 5x5 timed 65%/100 average time by a whopping 0.001 seconds! but for how long? I do wonder if you haven't inspired danvijan to set a new personal goal for the 5x5 timed puzzles. |
Author: | sheldolina [ Fri Jun 15, 2012 9:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: woohoo |
pnm wrote: Finally beat "danvijan" on the 5x5 timed 65%/100 average time by a whopping 0.001 seconds! Now, what about setting a real goal this time, like beating me? That would be, like, actually impressive. |
Author: | pnm [ Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: woohoo |
sheldolina wrote: Now, what about setting a real goal this time, like beating me? That would be, like, actually impressive. Yeah yeah. I'd have to go into hard training for that... (or just speed up the timer when you're playing ) |
Author: | danvijan [ Sat Jun 16, 2012 12:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: woohoo |
pnm wrote: I'd have to go into hard training for that... I don't think hard training is enough. You have to do a "Benjamin Button" routine, and actually get younger as time goes by. As for our little battle for the 5th, I won't go down without a fight |
Author: | pnm [ Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: woohoo |
danvijan wrote: As for our little battle for the 5th, I won't go down without a fight One planned change, by the way: times expire after one year (so people who haven't played in a long time slowly go down the rankings) Patrick |
Author: | picklepep [ Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: woohoo |
pnm wrote: danvijan wrote: As for our little battle for the 5th, I won't go down without a fight One planned change, by the way: times expire after one year (so people who haven't played in a long time slowly go down the rankings) Patrick Even all time rankings??? That doesn't make that much sense. Didn't Hank Aaron hold the most homeruns in a season for about 50 years? |
Author: | pnm [ Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: woohoo |
picklepep wrote: Even all time rankings??? That doesn't make that much sense. Didn't Hank Aaron hold the most homeruns in a season for about 50 years? Times set for the timed puzzles. |
Author: | picklepep [ Sat Jun 16, 2012 3:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: woohoo |
pnm wrote: picklepep wrote: Even all time rankings??? That doesn't make that much sense. Didn't Hank Aaron hold the most homeruns in a season for about 50 years? Times set for the timed puzzles. Yes I understand. My concern is for the all time best time. i.e. if I somehow never match my 37 sec 6x6 time it goes away in a year. It is still my personal best and I wouldn't like it to disappear. I think it is probably a good idea for the aggregates tho |
Author: | pnm [ Sat Jun 16, 2012 3:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: woohoo |
picklepep wrote: Yes I understand. My concern is for the all time best time. i.e. if I somehow never match my 37 sec 6x6 time it goes away in a year. It is still my personal best and I wouldn't like it to disappear. I think it is probably a good idea for the aggregates tho Good point. I can't assume everyone will continue to improve |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |