|
FAQ
• Search
•
• Once you reach 10 points, you'll be able to post messages on the forum. You can then log in automatically via the puzzle site.
|
Author |
Message |
beaker
Posted on: Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:40 am
Posts: 931 Location: Ladysmith, BC, Canada Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:37 am
|
Re: more of which puzzle?
pnm wrote: picklepep wrote: At one point you had a 7x7 that incorporated all the specialty operations. I think it was one of the bonus puzzles, but it was fairly easy. I think something like that could get people more used to the alternative operators. Yes, "7x7 ManyOp" (on Mondays), I ended up dropping the bitwise OR operator from that one.. Patrick Keep the timed puzzles in the "timed puzzles area" and just put in an easy 7x7/8x8 or 9/9 or alternate the 3 on 3 different weeks. Or give us an easy 7x7 or 8x8 double puzzle on alsternate weeks
|
|
|
|
sjs34
Posted on: Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:07 pm
Posts: 276 Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 11:51 pm
|
Re: more of which puzzle?
I enjoy all the special puzzles except the all-multiplication 8x8 pattern which is usually pretty uninteresting. The "Variations" chapter of "101 Advanced Puzzles" was appealing. I particularly like twins and large. Bigger twins and more 10x10, 12x12, and 16x16 regulars would be nice. A few easier 9x9s and above or specials could be relaxing for advanced puzzlers and engaging for newer puzzlers.
I do not like timed puzzles. I think they are a very different entity than untimed ones. I appreciate that highest recognition should be given to those good at both but I keep hoping that Patrick will also develop separate rankings for timed and untimed.
This is my first post so I'll do the self-identifying that others have in the past. I'm a 65 year old pen and paper male with minimal computer skills. There certainly appears to be a divergence by age regarding whether or not one enjoys timed puzzles.
|
|
|
|
sneaklyfox
Posted on: Fri Jan 13, 2012 9:36 pm
Posts: 428 Location: Canada Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 2:43 am
|
Re: more of which puzzle?
A large twin, maybe 10x10 sounds fun, actually.
And yes, probably those who like timed puzzles are of the *younger* age group, but I don't know for sure because only a few people have said how old they are. When one gets older the synapses just don't fire as quickly.
|
|
|
|
beaker
Posted on: Sat Jan 14, 2012 12:05 am
Posts: 931 Location: Ladysmith, BC, Canada Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:37 am
|
Re: more of which puzzle?
sjs34 wrote: I enjoy all the special puzzles except the all-multiplication 8x8 pattern which is usually pretty uninteresting. The "Variations" chapter of "101 Advanced Puzzles" was appealing. I particularly like twins and large. Bigger twins and more 10x10, 12x12, and 16x16 regulars would be nice. A few easier 9x9s and above or specials could be relaxing for advanced puzzlers and engaging for newer puzzlers.
I do not like timed puzzles. I think they are a very different entity than untimed ones. I appreciate that highest recognition should be given to those good at both but I keep hoping that Patrick will also develop separate rankings for timed and untimed.
This is my first post so I'll do the self-identifying that others have in the past. I'm a 65 year old pen and paper male with minimal computer skills. There certainly appears to be a divergence by age regarding whether or not one enjoys timed puzzles. I too have minimal computer skills and no understanding of mod or bitwise puzzles.....I would prefer lower numbered twins in the 7x7 and 8x8 range.....my math skills are questionable once I get into certain 9x9's, 10x10's and 12x12's.....and am also a paper and pen male of 67
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|