Author |
Message |
pnm
Posted on: Tue Jan 26, 2021 1:56 pm
Posts: 3365 Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 11:58 pm
|
mark "solvers people" in the rankings?
Hello, I've had some complaints about some puzzlers who use solvers (which is not allowed for the timed puzzles, and frowned upon for the regular puzzles). Especially people who use solvers to maintain their "100% solved" status are complained about. Should I remove them from the rankings? Or maybe mark the entries as "this person uses software to solve the puzzles"? Opinions appreciated Patrick
Last edited by pnm on Wed May 24, 2023 9:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
paulv66
Posted on: Tue Jan 26, 2021 2:25 pm
Posts: 990 Location: Ukraine Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:03 pm
|
Re: mark "solvers people" in the rankings?
It definitely distorts the rankings if it includes people who use a solver instead of actually solving the puzzle through their own efforts. So I would definitely support either excluding anyone who regularly uses solvers from the tables or having them identified as someone who uses a solver and having a facility to look at the rankings excluding this category (as you can currently do in relation to subscribers) .
Personally, I can’t see what satisfaction people derive from seeing their names at the top of the rankings if it is entirely due to the use of a solver. It would be a bit like someone using a motorbike to win the Tour de France.
|
|
|
|
eclipsegirl
Posted on: Tue Jan 26, 2021 3:38 pm
Posts: 707 Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 9:20 pm
|
Re: mark "solvers people" in the rankings?
My opinions are similar to Paul's
I would prefer to know who is doing these puzzles by themselves.
|
|
|
|
fzpowerman47
Posted on: Tue Jan 26, 2021 8:04 pm
Posts: 83 Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:16 am
|
Re: mark "solvers people" in the rankings?
totally agree with Paul But, how to know who uses a solver ?? It's true, if it's a computer which solves puzzles instead of the person, it's null and illegitimate
|
|
|
|
vittorio
Posted on: Tue Jan 26, 2021 10:07 pm
Posts: 35 Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 11:45 pm
|
Re: mark "solvers people" in the rankings?
paulv66 wrote: Personally, I can’t see what satisfaction people derive from seeing their names at the top of the rankings if it is entirely due to the use of a solver. It would be a bit like someone using a motorbike to win the Tour de France.
That is ABSOLUTELY my thinking! Great comparison, Paul.
|
|
|
|
ofszombie
Posted on: Thu Jan 28, 2021 10:37 pm
Posts: 2 Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 3:57 am
|
Re: mark "solvers people" in the rankings?
IMHO...Any puzzles solved using a solver should not be counted in any points rankings at all (If you are able to do that). Oherwise, put those users in their own separate ranking list. What's the point of even including them in the list of people who did the solving if a computer did it for them?
O.
|
|
|
|
ysth
Posted on: Thu Jan 28, 2021 11:56 pm
Posts: 5 Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:27 pm
|
Re: mark "solvers people" in the rankings?
Doesn't seem worth worrying about.
|
|
|
|
ineedaname
Posted on: Fri Jan 29, 2021 9:37 am
Posts: 61 Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 2:21 am
|
Re: mark "solvers people" in the rankings?
It's the same as drug cheats in the Olympics, I say ban them. How could you use a solver for a timed puzzle anyway, You'd still have to be a bloody quick typer.
|
|
|
|
pnm
Posted on: Fri Jan 29, 2021 10:34 am
Posts: 3365 Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 11:58 pm
|
Re: mark "solvers people" in the rankings?
ineedaname wrote: It's the same as drug cheats in the Olympics, I say ban them. How could you use a solver for a timed puzzle anyway, You'd still have to be a bloody quick typer. This is mostly about using one for the regular puzzles. And if you use one for the timed puzzles, it's easier to type in just the solution of course. (and a different analogy would be to use a chess engine when solving the puzzles at chess.com)
|
|
|
|
vittorio
Posted on: Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:10 pm
Posts: 35 Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 11:45 pm
|
Re: mark "solvers people" in the rankings?
Any other suggestions? Any decisions?
|
|
|
|
|