Author 
Message 
larryb33
Posted on: Sat May 14, 2011 4:59 pm
Posts: 8 Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:15 am

Subtraction and Division with 3 or more squares
Before discovering the puzzles on this site, I had only seen the  and / operators with 2 squares. I had assumed this would be the case since multiplication and addition are associative operations whereas subtraction and division are not. Has anyone else felt confusion over the quotient of 4,8,2 for example? I see a potential ambiguity with (8/4)/2 = 1, 8/(4/2) = 4, 4/(2/8) = 16, etc.
Anyway, after solving many of these puzzles, it seems that the convention is to always subtract and divide in descending order. Is this correct?




sneaklyfox
Posted on: Sat May 14, 2011 5:15 pm
Posts: 422 Location: Canada Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 2:43 am

Re: Subtraction and Division with 3 or more squares
Dividing or subtracting in descending order is mostly correct although it can be either 8/4/2 or 8/2/4. The highest number goes in the front.
Or really, it can be any order but without using brackets. The highest number must be the first one if you want a nonfractional or nonnegative result.




larryb33
Posted on: Sat May 14, 2011 6:23 pm
Posts: 8 Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:15 am

Re: Subtraction and Division with 3 or more squares
That make sense, thanks. I suppose I can't go wrong with highest number minus the sum of the others and highest number divided by the product of the others.




richr
Posted on: Tue May 17, 2011 7:16 pm
Posts: 2 Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 5:08 pm

Re: Subtraction and Division with 3 or more squares
Any order is OK as long as the result is a non negative integer. Sometimes a different order gives different results, like 9,3,3: (= either 9 or 1) . As long as one of the results fits, it is OK.




maartensmit
Posted on: Tue May 17, 2011 7:20 pm
Posts: 20 Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Subtraction and Division with 3 or more squares
richr wrote: Any order is OK as long as the result is a non negative integer. Sometimes a different order gives different results, like 9,3,3: (= either 9 or 1) . As long as one of the results fits, it is OK. That's not true. 9 3 3 only yields 1 as answer, not 9 (I think you meant 9/(3/3) = 1?) The best way to solve this problem is as sneaklyfox already said, to not use brackets and always put the numbers in descending order.
_________________ Confucius say  'He who stands on toilet is high on pot.'




larryb33
Posted on: Tue May 17, 2011 9:49 pm
Posts: 8 Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:15 am

Re: Subtraction and Division with 3 or more squares
maartensmit wrote: The best way to solve this problem is as sneaklyfox already said, to not use brackets and always put the numbers in descending order. I just thought of an exception to descending order with division, but only when 0 is possible. If 3 squares are labeled 0/, you know the order of division will be 0/x/y (obviously not descending).




maartensmit
Posted on: Tue May 17, 2011 9:53 pm
Posts: 20 Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Subtraction and Division with 3 or more squares
larryb33 wrote: maartensmit wrote: The best way to solve this problem is as sneaklyfox already said, to not use brackets and always put the numbers in descending order. I just thought of an exception to descending order with division, but only when 0 is possible. If 3 squares are labeled 0/, you know the order of division will be 0/x/y (obviously not descending). Ah, yes, that is true. I didn't think of that, I always skip the puzzles with zero
_________________ Confucius say  'He who stands on toilet is high on pot.'




sneaklyfox
Posted on: Wed May 18, 2011 1:45 am
Posts: 422 Location: Canada Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 2:43 am

Re: Subtraction and Division with 3 or more squares
maartensmit wrote: 9 3 3 only yields 1 as answer, not 9 (I think you meant 9/(3/3) = 1?) 9/(3/3) = 9/1 = 9 But anyway, the puzzles don't work like that. No brackets. As for the zero puzzles, you have to forget that there is such a thing as x/0 = infinity because the puzzles do allow you to have more than one zero in a 0: box (in L configuration, for example). Assuming that none of the puzzles operate with brackets, that should not be possible. So you can treat 0/0 = 0.




pnm
Posted on: Thu May 19, 2011 11:28 am
Posts: 2363 Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 11:58 pm

Re: Subtraction and Division with 3 or more squares
sneaklyfox wrote: 9/(3/3) = 9/1 = 9 But anyway, the puzzles don't work like that. No brackets.
As for the zero puzzles, you have to forget that there is such a thing as x/0 = infinity because the puzzles do allow you to have more than one zero in a 0: box (in L configuration, for example). Assuming that none of the puzzles operate with brackets, that should not be possible. So you can treat 0/0 = 0. Spot on in both cases. No brackets are involved, and you can't do division by zero (so a cage with 3 cells can never have 2 zeroes, for example) Patrick




sneaklyfox
Posted on: Fri May 20, 2011 2:57 am
Posts: 422 Location: Canada Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 2:43 am

Re: Subtraction and Division with 3 or more squares
Can't have two or more zeros in a cage? Ok, maybe I forgot. I just thought maybe that had happened. Maybe it was 0x.




