Re: another (easy) tectonic
angryclown wrote:
Thanks! But I have to ask... is the fifth number on the first row really a 4? I had a two in that cell.. Did I misunderstant the rules or something?
-Ville
Interesting how one can be blind to something like this..
no way there can be two 4's next to each other of course, will investigate...
It seems to have been something with the rendering of the solution (not the solver itself),
this is the correct solution: